Comparison chart of GMP vs Non-GMP peptide suppliers highlighting FDA-approved facilities and strict quality standards.

Cagrilintide: Amylin Analog Research Guide and Trial Data

Table of Contents

Cagrilintide 5mg research peptide vial

Cagrilintide is a long-acting, lipidated analog of amylin, a 37-amino-acid pancreatic hormone, developed by Novo Nordisk for weight management research (Kruse 2021). It activates both amylin receptors and the calcitonin receptor, and a 2026 structural study describes it as a dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist, or DACRA (Gu 2026). In clinical trials it has been tested alone and combined with semaglutide as CagriSema. Research-grade cagrilintide peptide for laboratory use is a separate material sold for in vitro and animal work only.

Key takeaways

  • Amylin is co-secreted with insulin by pancreatic beta cells and signals through receptors built from the calcitonin receptor plus a receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP).
  • Pramlintide, an earlier FDA-approved amylin analog (initial U.S. approval 2005), has a half-life of about 48 minutes. Cagrilintide is a lipidated, long-acting analog that trials tested once weekly.
  • In a 26-week phase 2 dose-finding trial, cagrilintide produced 6.0% to 10.8% mean weight reductions across five doses, compared with 3.0% for placebo (Lau 2021).
  • In the phase 3 REDEFINE 1 trial, CagriSema produced a mean weight change of -20.4% at week 68, compared with -3.0% for placebo (Garvey 2025). The trial also included cagrilintide-only and semaglutide-only arms.
  • As of September 2026, DailyMed lists no FDA label for cagrilintide or CagriSema, and neither is FDA approved.

Amylin biology: the hormone cagrilintide is built on

A second beta-cell hormone

Amylin is a 37-amino-acid peptide made by pancreatic beta cells. A 2015 review describes it mainly as a glucoregulatory hormone and a regulator of energy metabolism, acting chiefly in the circumventricular organs of the brain (Hay 2015). The pramlintide label adds that amylin is stored with insulin in the same secretory granules and released with it after food intake (SYMLIN label). The same label notes that people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes secrete less amylin after meals.

Receptors: calcitonin receptor plus RAMPs

Amylin receptors are G protein-coupled receptors formed when the core calcitonin receptor (CTR) is co-expressed with a receptor activity-modifying protein (Hay 2015). Each of the three RAMPs yields a different subtype, called AMY1R, AMY2R and AMY3R. Because amylin and calcitonin receptors share the same core protein, selectivity between them is an active research question for amylin analogs.

Pramlintide, the earlier approved amylin analog

Native human amylin readily forms amyloid fibrils, which makes it a difficult starting point for drug design (Kruse 2021). Pramlintide swaps three residues for proline, at positions 25, 28 and 29 (SYMLIN label).

The SYMLIN label lists an initial U.S. approval of 2005, as an adjunct in type 1 or type 2 diabetes for people using mealtime insulin. According to the label, pramlintide slows gastric emptying, reduces the post-meal rise in glucagon, and modulates satiety. It carries a boxed warning for severe hypoglycemia with insulin. Its half-life is roughly 48 minutes, and cagrilintide’s developers cite that short half-life as the limitation they set out to address (Kruse 2021).

Cagrilintide design and receptor pharmacology

Design and chemistry

Novo Nordisk scientists described the development of cagrilintide in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry in 2021. They reported a stable, lipidated amylin analog selected through a structure-activity program for clinical development in obesity (Kruse 2021).

Why it is called a DACRA

DACRA stands for dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist. A cryo-electron microscopy study, published online in August 2025 and in print in January 2026, describes cagrilintide as a DACRA (Gu 2026). It reports structures of the peptide bound to AMY1R and to CTR, each in complex with the Gs protein. Cagrilintide adopted a similar binding mode in both receptors and activated Gs signaling through each without meaningful selectivity.

The authors link this to three features. A phenylalanine at position 23 anchors the peptide near the transmembrane bundle. A salt bridge between residues 14 and 17 stabilizes the helix. A C-terminal proline contacts the receptor’s extracellular domain.

Clinical trial findings

The trials below were sponsored by Novo Nordisk. Each defined its own population, duration and statistical estimand, so numbers from different trials are not directly comparable.

Lau 2021: phase 2 dose-finding (cagrilintide alone)

This trial ran at 57 sites in ten countries. It enrolled adults without diabetes who had a BMI of at least 30, or at least 27 with hypertension or dyslipidemia (Lau 2021). Participants were randomized to once-weekly cagrilintide at 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4 or 4.5 mg, once-daily liraglutide 3.0 mg, or placebo, for 26 weeks. In all, 706 participants were randomized.

Under the trial product estimand, mean weight reductions ranged from 6.0% to 10.8% across cagrilintide doses, compared with 3.0% for placebo. The 4.5 mg group lost 10.8% versus 9.0% with liraglutide 3.0 mg, an estimated difference of 1.8 percentage points (p=0.03). Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 41% to 63% of cagrilintide groups versus 32% with placebo, driven mainly by nausea.

Frias 2023: CagriSema phase 2 in type 2 diabetes

This 32-week, double-blind trial at 17 U.S. sites randomized 92 adults with type 2 diabetes and a BMI of 27 or higher, all on metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor (Frias 2023). They received CagriSema (n=31), semaglutide (n=31) or cagrilintide (n=30), each escalated to 2.4 mg. It compared the two components with each other and with the combination.

  • HbA1c (primary endpoint): -2.2 percentage points with CagriSema, -1.8 with semaglutide and -0.9 with cagrilintide. CagriSema was superior to cagrilintide but not to semaglutide (difference -0.4; p=0.075).
  • Body weight: -15.6% with CagriSema, -5.1% with semaglutide and -8.1% with cagrilintide. CagriSema was superior to both components (p<0.0001 for each).
  • Continuous glucose monitoring: time in range rose from 45.9% to 88.9% with CagriSema, from 32.6% to 76.2% with semaglutide, and from 56.9% to 71.7% with cagrilintide.
  • Safety: adverse events were reported by 68%, 71% and 80% of participants, respectively. Mild or moderate gastrointestinal events were most common, and no level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia was reported.

REDEFINE 1: phase 3 in overweight or obesity without diabetes

REDEFINE 1 was a 68-week, double-blind trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2025 (Garvey 2025). It randomized 3,417 adults without diabetes in a 21:3:3:7 ratio, all with lifestyle intervention. The arms were CagriSema 2.4 mg/2.4 mg (n=2,108), semaglutide 2.4 mg alone (n=302), cagrilintide 2.4 mg alone (n=302) and placebo (n=705).

The primary analysis used the treatment-policy estimand, which counts participants regardless of whether they stayed on treatment. On that basis, mean weight change was -20.4% with CagriSema and -3.0% with placebo, an estimated difference of -17.3 percentage points (95% CI -18.1 to -16.6). CagriSema participants were more likely to reach every prespecified threshold, including reductions of 20%, 25% and 30% or more. Gastrointestinal adverse events affected 79.6% of the CagriSema group and 39.9% of the placebo group, mainly transient and mild to moderate.

A 2026 secondary analysis reports all four arms under the trial product estimand, which assumes treatment was taken as intended without rescue intervention (Busetto 2026). On that basis, mean weight change at week 68 was -22.7% with CagriSema, -16.1% with semaglutide alone, -11.8% with cagrilintide alone and -2.3% with placebo. The two sets of numbers come from different estimands and should not be mixed.

REDEFINE 2: phase 3 in type 2 diabetes

REDEFINE 2 enrolled adults with type 2 diabetes, a BMI of 27 or more and an HbA1c of 7% to 10% in 12 countries (Davies 2025). It randomized 1,206 participants 3:1 to CagriSema 2.4 mg/2.4 mg (n=904) or placebo (n=302) for 68 weeks. Mean weight change was -13.7% with CagriSema and -3.4% with placebo, an estimated difference of -10.4 percentage points (95% CI -11.2 to -9.5). An HbA1c of 6.5% or less was reached by 73.5% of the CagriSema group and 15.9% of the placebo group. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported in 72.5% and 34.4%, respectively.

REDEFINE 1 and REDEFINE 2 enrolled different populations, so the smaller weight change in REDEFINE 2 is not a head-to-head comparison between the trials.

Cagrilintide vs semaglutide, CagriSema and tirzepatide

The table places cagrilintide next to the compounds it is most often compared with. The cagrilintide and CagriSema rows come from REDEFINE 1. Semaglutide and tirzepatide results come from their own phase 3 obesity trials, STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-1.

Compound Class and receptor targets Developer Key trial Reported result
Cagrilintide Lipidated amylin analog; agonist at amylin receptors and CTR (DACRA) Novo Nordisk REDEFINE 1 cagrilintide-only arm, 68 weeks (Busetto 2026) Weight -11.8% vs -2.3% placebo (trial product estimand)
Semaglutide GLP-1 receptor agonist Novo Nordisk STEP 1, 68 weeks, 2.4 mg weekly (Wilding 2021) Weight -14.9% vs -2.4% placebo (treatment-policy estimand)
CagriSema Cagrilintide 2.4 mg plus semaglutide 2.4 mg; amylin/calcitonin plus GLP-1 receptors Novo Nordisk REDEFINE 1, 68 weeks (Garvey 2025) Weight -20.4% vs -3.0% placebo (treatment-policy estimand); -22.7% vs -2.3% (trial product estimand, Busetto 2026)
Tirzepatide Dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist Eli Lilly SURMOUNT-1, 72 weeks (Jastreboff 2022) Weight -15.0%, -19.5% and -20.9% at 5, 10 and 15 mg vs -3.1% placebo (treatment-regimen estimand)

The table is a summary, not a ranking. The trials differ in length, in how they handled treatment discontinuation, and in who they enrolled. None of the trials cited here compared CagriSema with tirzepatide. Researchers working on incretin compounds can find a similar comparison for a triple agonist in our retatrutide research guide.

How the mechanisms and single-drug results differ

Semaglutide acts on the GLP-1 receptor. Tirzepatide adds the GIP receptor. Cagrilintide works through a separate hormone system, the calcitonin receptor family, and has been studied both alone and alongside semaglutide.

Two trials report the components side by side. In Frias 2023, among 92 adults with type 2 diabetes, cagrilintide alone produced more weight loss than semaglutide alone over 32 weeks (-8.1% versus -5.1%) but a smaller HbA1c reduction (-0.9 versus -1.8 percentage points) (Frias 2023). In the much larger REDEFINE 1, among adults without diabetes, the pattern reversed on weight: -11.8% with cagrilintide alone versus -16.1% with semaglutide alone at 68 weeks, under the trial product estimand (Busetto 2026). In both trials, the combination produced more weight loss than either component.

Regulatory status

Cagrilintide is an investigational compound. A search of DailyMed, the National Library of Medicine’s database of FDA-submitted drug labels, returns no results for cagrilintide as of September 2026 (DailyMed search). Neither cagrilintide nor CagriSema is FDA approved. Pramlintide, by contrast, has an FDA label (SYMLIN label).

Research applications

For laboratory work, cagrilintide is most useful as a tool for questions about calcitonin-family receptor pharmacology. Published work points to several areas:

  • Receptor selectivity and signaling. Because cagrilintide activates both amylin receptors and CTR without meaningful selectivity, it serves as a reference agonist in assays that compare signaling across these receptors (Gu 2026).
  • Structural biology. Published cryo-EM structures of cagrilintide bound to AMY1R and CTR give a starting point for mutagenesis and for designing analogs with different selectivity profiles (Gu 2026).
  • Peptide stability and aggregation. Amylin’s tendency to form amyloid fibrils makes stability a central design problem. Cagrilintide provides a lipidated, stabilized comparator for aggregation and formulation studies (Kruse 2021).
  • Combination pharmacology. The clinical pairing of cagrilintide with a GLP-1 agonist raises mechanistic questions suited to preclinical models, such as how amylin and incretin signaling interact in energy balance. Reference comparators include semaglutide research peptide and tirzepatide 5 mg research peptide.

Any such work should use analytically verified material, with identity confirmed by mass spectrometry and purity confirmed by HPLC. It should also follow the institutional approvals that apply to in vitro or animal research.

Frequently asked questions

What is CagriSema?

CagriSema is the investigational combination of cagrilintide 2.4 mg and semaglutide 2.4 mg tested in the REDEFINE 1 and REDEFINE 2 phase 3 trials (Garvey 2025; Davies 2025).

How does cagrilintide differ from semaglutide?

Semaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist, while cagrilintide acts on amylin and calcitonin receptors. The single-drug comparison depends on the trial: cagrilintide produced more weight loss than semaglutide in the 92-person Frias 2023 trial and less in the 3,417-person REDEFINE 1 trial (Busetto 2026). See the comparison section above.

Is cagrilintide FDA approved?

No. As of September 2026, DailyMed lists no FDA label for cagrilintide or CagriSema.

Sourcing cagrilintide for laboratory research

Peptides For Sale supplies cagrilintide for in vitro and preclinical research in two sizes: cagrilintide 5 mg vials and cagrilintide 10 mg vials. Request the certificate of analysis for each lot before use, and confirm that identity and purity data match your experimental requirements.

References

  1. Hay DL, Chen S, Lutz TA, Parkes DG, Roth JD. Amylin: pharmacology, physiology, and clinical potential. Pharmacol Rev. 2015;67(3):564-600. PubMed 26071095
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. SYMLIN (pramlintide acetate) injection, prescribing information. DailyMed, National Library of Medicine. DailyMed
  3. Kruse T, Hansen JL, Dahl K, et al. Development of cagrilintide, a long-acting amylin analogue. J Med Chem. 2021;64(15):11183-11194. PubMed 34288673
  4. Gu YM, Yuan QN, Li X, He Q, Xu HE, Zhao LH. Structural and mechanistic insights into dual activation of cagrilintide in amylin and calcitonin receptors. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2026;47(1):162-172. Epub 2025 Aug 22. PubMed 40847076
  5. Lau DCW, Erichsen L, Francisco AM, et al. Once-weekly cagrilintide for weight management in people with overweight and obesity: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10317):2160-2172. PubMed 34798060
  6. Frias JP, Deenadayalan S, Erichsen L, et al. Efficacy and safety of co-administered once-weekly cagrilintide 2.4 mg with once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg in type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10403):720-730. PubMed 37364590
  7. Garvey WT, Blüher M, Osorto Contreras CK, et al. Coadministered cagrilintide and semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity (REDEFINE 1). N Engl J Med. 2025;393(7):635-647. PubMed 40544433
  8. Busetto L, Contreras CO, Christensen MH, et al. Efficacy of CagriSema for reaching anthropometric treatment targets and cardiometabolic outcomes: a secondary, post hoc analysis of REDEFINE 1. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2026;28(10):9317-9325. PMC13538786
  9. Davies MJ, Bajaj HS, Broholm C, et al. Cagrilintide-semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes (REDEFINE 2). N Engl J Med. 2025;393(7):648-659. PubMed 40544432
  10. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 1). N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989-1002. PubMed 33567185
  11. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity (SURMOUNT-1). N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):205-216. PubMed 35658024
  12. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed search results for “cagrilintide” (accessed September 2026). DailyMed

Research use only. All products sold on this site are intended strictly for in vitro laboratory research and preclinical study by qualified professionals. They are not drugs, foods, or cosmetics, are not intended for human or veterinary use, and must not be used to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Nothing in this article is medical advice or guidance for personal use. Clinical trial results described here refer to investigational products studied under regulated conditions and do not apply to research-grade materials.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *